The latest OnePlus Buds Pro 3 were recently launched at a price of ₹13,999, with potential discounts available. As someone who used the Buds Pro 2 daily for much of last year, I was eager to try these new earbuds, and I have several observations to share.
Design, Build, and Feel
The design of the Buds Pro 3 has seen some notable changes. First, the charging case has been updated to a flip design, similar to other recent OnePlus earbuds, moving away from the flat design of the Buds Pro 2. The case now features a textured, leather-like finish that enhances grip and feels sturdy and premium in hand. However, like Apple’s AirPods, they now come in a white colour, called Lunar Radiance, which may require more frequent cleaning.
The earbuds themselves maintain the familiar in-ear stem design but with some visible differences. The Buds Pro 3 are slightly larger, indicating an internal redesign, possibly to accommodate the dual DACs in each earbud, which deliver a more powerful audio experience compared to the previous model.
The stems are now longer and feature a touch-enabled sliding function for adjusting volume—a welcome and much-needed addition. However, getting the gesture right can be tricky, as I found my left earbud occasionally slipping out. The earbuds also now have “L” and “R” markings, making it easier to identify the correct earbud, another thoughtful improvement. And with an IP55 rating, won’t have sweat creep in through them.
A nice touch is the “co-created with Dynaudio” branding on the earbuds and the case.
Sound Performance
The Buds Pro 3 support Fast Pair, which means they quickly connect to Android devices, especially OnePlus phones, when brought close. The pairing process is swift, and the earbuds offer the same settings as the Buds Pro 2, with no significant changes. iPhone users can access similar features through the HeyMelody app, though OnePlus should do more to highlight this compatibility.
In terms of sound quality, the Buds Pro 3 deliver a noticeably louder, clearer, and crisper audio output. The bass is well-rounded, much like the Buds Pro 2, but with a richer overall sound. OnePlus claims these earbuds can cancel noise up to -50dB, and they deliver on that promise. The Adaptive Noise Cancellation feature adjusts to your environment, cutting out outside noise more naturally than the Buds Pro 2, which tended to create a slight vacuum effect.
Areas for Improvement
While the overall experience is designed with OnePlus phone users in mind, I feel there’s room for improvement for iOS users. The fit of the ear tips also leaves something to be desired. Despite trying all the provided tips, the fit still felt average and slightly loose during sound tests.
Another issue I’ve noticed with the Buds Pro 2 is that latency tends to increase over time, particularly when connected to a TV, leading to brief connection drops. I’ll need more time with the Buds Pro 3 to see if this issue persists.
As for call quality, there’s definite improvement—voices sound clearer, though still somewhat robotic.
Conclusion
The OnePlus Buds Pro 3 are simple and easy to use. Just pop them open, and they connect to your paired devices, ready to go. They offer a range of customization options and deliver sound quality that sits comfortably between Apple’s AirPods Pro and Samsung’s Buds Pro.
The standout feature here is the price. At ₹13,999, with potential discounts making them even more affordable, the Buds Pro 3 offer excellent value for money. With features like multiple device connections, fast charging (providing up to 43 hours of listening time), and LHDC support (though this won’t work with iOS and Pixel devices), they are a compelling choice.
Ultimately, it’s the combination of price and features that make the OnePlus Buds Pro 3 a great product for the money, especially when compared to pricier competitors like AirPods and Samsung buds.
A Nu contender has entered the arena of electronic accessories! Nu Republic, a Delhi-based lifestyle technology brand with a variety of wearable technology and more. They recently launched the Cybotron SPIN – a compact MagSafe compatible wireless power bank with a fidget spinner on it! Because apparently, it’s still a thing in 2024?
The MRP on the box is ₹5499 but you can get it at a discounted price of ₹2499 on their website. In this review we will find out how it performs and also if it is a product that you invest in or may be take for a spin!
What’s In the Box:
The power bank
A USB A to C cable
A card which has a QR code for a user manual – that leads to their website, where the manual doesn’t exist (yet?)
No literature
The packaging is minimal, with the only “waste” in the box being the cover that the power bank comes wrapped in and the cable tie.
Features:
Comes with a capacity of 10,000mAh, and supports two inputs – USB Type C and lightning. The output varies on the port you’re using:
USB-C: 20W max
USB-A: 22.5W max
Wireless: 15W max
This supports Quick Charge (QC) and Power Delivery (PD) standard, which is a standard for a lot of devices in the market.
The power bank is small, and feels solid to hold even though the body is built out of plastic. The rectangular design is easily recognizable and is easy to hold.
There is a tiny LED screen which shows the charging and a PD indicator and battery percentage – while both charging and discharging. One gripe with this design is that this screen is actually upside down when it’s connected to an Apple device for charging, because for MagSafecharging orientation matters. The magnets are solid and it takes a little bit of force to separate it from the phone.
When charging wirelessly on an iPhone, the normal charging animation appears, but unlike other packs, a second animation displaying the power bank’s remaining level isn’t shown. This is fine because the power bank has a display of its own (albeit upside down).
Charging with the USB A port is quick, as advertised. Tested on an android device, the phone indicated that it was “charging rapidly”, going from 40% to 80% in under 30 minutes.
Throughout our charging cycles, the power bank showed signs of very minimal heating, scoring itself some more positive points.
Conclusion
At this price, this seems like a solid bang-for-the-buck product. A compact, MagSafecompatible, wireless charger that can charge your phone twice at up to 22.5W will be a boon for power users on the go. This is for someone who recently acquired a phone with fast and wireless charging capabilities and requires charge throughout the day. Or if you have an iPhone and are looking for a power bank that sets you apart with its “cyberpunk” aesthetic. Or you’re a photographer who owns a mirrorless camera need a power bank to extend the life of your camera on-location!
But while this design is good and swanky, it isn’t the slimmest in the market, which might be a deal breaker for some, considering that all accessories are fighting for real estate space in your bags today.
And who can forget the fidget spinner which is easily the best feature of this device.
But is it worth the ₹2500 price tag? That’s for you to decide, as the competition is quite fierce in this segment. Especially if you don’t care about MagSafe wireless charging, where you can find similarly specced power banks for half the price, or bigger capacity banks for the same price.
According to us, the Nu Republic Cybotron Spin gets a solid recommendation!
Vivo’s new V40 series introduces a compelling feature—Zeiss-engineered cameras at a more affordable price. Starting at ₹36,000, the V40 is the first in Vivo’s non-Pro series to include Zeiss optics, making high-quality photography more accessible. But what makes this phone stand out against its pricier counterparts? Let’s dive into its camera setup and examine how it performs in real-world scenarios, especially in terms of image quality and user experience.
Camera Set-up:
50-MP Main Camera with ISOCELL GNJ Sensor, 4K up to 30fps
50-MPl Ultra-Wide Camera
50-MP Front Camera, 4K up to 30fps
Processor: Snapdragon 7 Gen 3
Aura Light
Daylight Main
The Vivo V40’s camera outputs at 14.3 MP, with a notable feature being the main camera’s intuitive slider that allows seamless switching between cameras, a user-friendly alternative to the traditional slider wheel found on most phones. In daylight conditions, the camera delivers decent images, though they may lack the sharpness expected by some users. Upon zooming in, noise becomes noticeable. However, the camera excels in colour reproduction and accuracy, consistently capturing colours true to life. In backlit situations, the camera does exhibit some issues, with increased contrast and over-sharpening, which can cause the shadows and highlights to appear slightly blown out.
Daylight Wide
The wide camera on the Vivo V40 delivers an actual output of 13.8 MP with a 15mm focal range. The images produced are accurate, with good colour balance and saturation. The camera also performs well in terms of detail, offering above-average sharpness for a wide lens, though it could still be a bit sharper. However, the camera does occasionally underexpose shots, leading to some loss of detail in shadows and highlights. On a positive note, distortion control is impressive, especially considering the price range, making the wide camera a solid performer overall.
Daylight Telephoto
The wide camera on the Vivo V40 delivers an actual output of 13.8 MP with a 15mm focal range, producing images with accurate colour balance and saturation. It performs well in capturing details, offering above-average sharpness for a wide lens, though there is room for improvement in sharpness. Occasionally, the camera underexposes shots, leading to a loss of detail in shadows and highlights. However, distortion control is impressive, particularly given the price range, making the wide camera a strong performer overall.
Lowlight Main
The Vivo says that V40’s camera has been specifically tuned to allow more light to pass through to its sensor, which significantly improves lowlight performance. The concept behind this is straightforward: a fast lens with an aperture like f/1.8 lets in more light, resulting in brighter images even in very lowlight conditions. The main camera performs impressively in lowlight, with accurate colour reproduction, warm tones, and overall pleasing visuals. However, despite the strong colour performance, the camera does fall short in terms of detail and sharpness. Zooming in on images reveals noticeable noise, and beyond a certain point, the images lose clarity, which is disappointing.
Lowlight Wide
The low-light performance of the wide-angle camera on the Vivo V40 falls short in its category. While the camera is quick to focus, it struggles to capture sharp images, resulting in visible shake and a lack of clarity when zoomed in. To the casual observer, the images may appear acceptable, but closer inspection reveals these flaws. However, the colours remain consistent and accurate, which is a positive aspect. Despite the drawbacks, the V40’s wide-angle lens still manages to deliver decent results in well-lit conditions, though improvements are needed for low-light scenarios.
Lowlight Telephoto
In the telephoto section, the Vivo V40’s performance is inconsistent due to the absence of a dedicated telephoto lens. The results can be hit or miss, with some images appearing sharp while others fall short. Without a dedicated telephoto lens, achieving high-quality zoomed-in shots is challenging. This limitation is noticeable in scenarios requiring precise detail at a distance. Overall, while the V40 excels in many areas, its telephoto capabilities are a clear area where it struggles.
Portraits
The Vivo V40 offers several portrait modes familiar to users of other Vivo phones. It provides shooting options at 24mm, 35mm, and 50mm focal lengths. At 24mm, images are sharp, though sharpness diminishes at 35mm and 50mm. Despite this, the photos remain visually pleasing with accurate colour reproduction. However, edge detection could be improved, as the camera sometimes struggles with sharpness and distinguishing outlines in certain conditions. This issue could potentially be addressed in future software updates. Overall, the depth and focus performance are commendable, and Zeiss provides additional settings for those seeking more customization.
Festive Mode
Another notable feature is the Festive mode, which appears to be specifically designed for the Indian market. This mode uses two LUTs (Look-Up Tables) to enhance photos. A single tap activates LUT 1, while tapping twice switches to LUT 2, providing different enhancements to suit festive settings.
Super Macro
The Vivo V40 also features a Super Macro mode on its main camera, allowing users to capture detailed close-ups. The images are generally good, although there may be a reddish tinge in some cases. Despite this minor issue, having a macro mode in this price range is a valuable addition for users, even though similar features are available on many other phones.
Front Camera
The Vivo V40 features a 50 MP front camera that delivers decent results. The images have a warm and pleasing tone, which is likely to appeal to users who prefer warmer selfies. The portrait mode also offers three different focal lengths, and the camera performs well overall. Edge detection and sharpness are decent, contributing to a satisfactory overall camera performance.
Video
The Vivo V40 can shoot videos in 4K at 30 fps and offers up to 10x zoom. The video quality is decent, with fast focusing and good stabilization. However, the camera tends to produce videos that are slightly more saturated and warm compared to the actual scene, which aligns with current consumer preferences for richer, warmer tones.
Conclusion
When initially approached about the Vivo V40’s cameras, there were reservations due to it being a non-Pro variant. However, the performance of the V40’s camera pleasantly exceeded expectations. A key factor in evaluating a phone camera is its consistency across different lenses, which can be challenging given varying specifications and sensors. The V40 stands out by delivering a consistent colour and tonal range across its cameras, a significant advantage. While it may not offer the sharpest images available, the overall camera performance at this price point is commendable. The Vivo V40 earns a thumbs up for its impressive consistency and value.
The OnePlus Nord CE 4 Lite 5G has recently hit the market as the most budget-friendly offering in the Nord series. Starting at an attractive price of ₹19,999 for the 8GB RAM + 128GB storage variant and ₹22,999 for the 8GB RAM + 256GB storage variant, this phone offers significant value for those looking to experience the Nord brand without breaking the bank. It is available in three striking colours: Mega Blue, Super Silver, and Ultra Orange.
We’ve got our hands on the Ultra Orange version with 8GB of RAM and 256GB of storage, and we’re excited to see how this affordable smartphone stands out in the camera department. We’ll be putting it through a series of rigorous tests to assess its camera performance, overall usability, and whether it truly delivers on its promise to be the go-to option for budget-conscious buyers looking for a premium experience.
Camera Setup
On the back of the phone, there’s a dual-camera setup that includes a 50 MP Sony LYT-600 sensor and a 2 MP depth assist camera, which helps with portrait shots by creating a blurred background effect. The phone is powered by the Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 processor, which was released in November 2023, given the price of this phone, having such a capable processor is a good deal. The front camera has a 16 MP resolution, but I don’t expect much from it. It can record videos in 1080p at 30fps with both the front and rear cameras, but there’s no 4K option even at the rear camera, which is a bit surprising. The phone can only shoot at 1x zoom since it has just one main camera. There is an option to zoom up to 10x, but that’s likely digital zoom, so I don’t expect much in terms of quality.
Daylight Main Camera
The Nord CE 4 Lite comes with a 50 MP main camera that uses a Sony LYT-600 sensor. When we took photos in daylight at 1x, the results were a bit average. The colours in the pictures looked slightly more saturated in some cases and less saturated in others, than they actually were, and the sharpness decreased noticeably when zooming in. While the exposure levels were generally good, the overall image quality was just okay. Images taken against natural light showed some areas of the sky burning out, making those parts of the image appear overly bright and washed out, as seen in the images. We also tried taking photos at 2x zoom, and they turned out less clear and less sharp compared to the 1x shots. Additionally, there was a significant difference in saturation when capturing the same subject at 2x zoom. Also the image shots against the natural light made the sky burn in some areas as you can see in the images.
Lowlight Main Camera
In lowlight conditions, the camera’s performance didn’t differ much from daylight shots. At 1x zoom, the images were similar in quality to those taken during the day, but they lost more detail and appeared noisier when zoomed in. The colours were somewhat accurate at 1x but still average. At 2x zoom, the images became soft with very little sharpness. Overall, the quality of lowlight images was okay.
Portraits
The camera includes a 2 MP depth assist lens, which helps create a blurred background effect for portrait shots. The portrait mode works quite well at 1x, with good exposure and sharpness, though the colours were a bit unsaturated. The edge detection was impressive. However, at 2x zoom, the image started to lose sharpness, though the edge detection remained consistent. Overall, the portrait images were good and met expectations.
Front Camera
The phone’s front camera has a 16 MP sensor. In normal mode, the images looked sharp and clear, but they appeared slightly hazy and less vibrant compared to the real scene. In portrait mode, the exposure and colours were similar to normal mode, and the edge detection was quite good.
Video
The phone can record videos in 1080p at 30fps, which is a bit surprising since even phones priced lower offer 4K at 30fps. As for the video quality, daylight videos are okay for 1080p, but they could be sharper. In lowlight, the video quality is average – it’s not very sharp and has some noise. Overall, the results were a bit below what was expected.
Conclusion
The OnePlus Nord CE 4 Lite 5G is a solid choice for those seeking a budget-friendly smartphone with decent camera capabilities, though it does come with a few compromises. The 50 MP main camera, while equipped with a reliable Sony LYT-600 sensor, delivers average performance in both daylight and lowlight, with noticeable issues in colour accuracy and sharpness, especially when zoomed in. The portrait mode performs well at 1x, but the quality diminishes at higher zoom levels. The front camera, although capable, also falls short of delivering vibrant and clear images. Video recording is limited to 1080p at 30fps, which might disappoint users expecting 4K resolution, especially since some lower-priced phones offer it. Overall, the Nord CE 4 Lite 5G offers decent camera performance for its price, but it doesn’t excel in any particular area. It’s a good option for casual users who need a reliable camera for everyday shots.
The OnePlus Nord series has been around for a while and the Nord 4 is the latest phone from the manufacturer in the mid-range segment, starting at ₹29,999 for the 8+128 GB variant, going up to ₹35,999 for the 12+256GB variant. It is powered by a Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 processor and the Adreno 732 GPU. The phone is available in three colours – Mercurial Silver, Obsidian Midnight, Oasis Green.
We’ve got our hands on the Mercurial Silver version with the 12GB RAM + 256GB storage and we’re excited to see how this is going to perform in this price-sensitive, highly competitive segment. We’re going to put this phone through our usual tests to assess its camera performance, overall usability, and how worthy it is as a successor to the Nord 3.
Camera Setup
This phone comes with two cameras at the back
50 MP Sony LYT600 sensor, which gives a 13.9 MP output, and
and an 8 MP ultrawide camera featuring the Sony IMX355 sensor, which gives an output of 8.9 MP
The front camera has a 16 MP Sony IMX471 sensor.
Daylight Main
In daylight the cameras performance is average. The images look slightly desaturated and lack contrast and details. And because of this the shadows also seem to be lifted up and hence, have visible noise in them when looked closely.
Against a backlit scenario as well the images look slightly overexposed, burning the details out. The overall performance in this case could’ve been better.
Daylight Wide
Usually the wide cameras always deliver an average performance in most cases and in a budget phone with a 8.9 MP camera we can’t expect much. With the Nord 4 as well, the images are average like most cameras and they don’t deliver an exceptional performance. However, what the phone has going for itself is that the image details, dynamic range and saturation are good. There is a little bit of distortion as expected in an ultrawide camera and the performance of the wide camera is better than the main camera we felt.
Daylight Telephoto
There is no dedicated telephoto camera and lens in this phone. The main camera is used to shoot tele photos and they are processed in the background. The max focal range is 20x for the Nord 4. However, even at 2x we can see desaturation and muddiness set in the images. Details are lost on the subject and as you increase the focal range the images loose sharpness.
Lowlight Images
In the lowlight category the images overall are decent. The phone renders images with good detail and colour reproduction with the main camera. In the wide category the images do display some flaring, but it still compensates and controls the output well. The images also seem brighter than the main camera.
As expected the phones struggles in the telephoto category and the images beyond 2x are barely usable.
Portraits
The Nord 4 allows you to shoot portraits at 1x and 2x lenses and the preview looks different than what the images it shoots. So this can be confusing. The shallow DoF effect looks unnatural sometimes and even though you can tweak how much DoF you want later, the bokeh still looks unnatural.
Now this is something that can be fixed in an update and we are sure that OP will do this. The edge detection is decent and the sharpness also on zooming in is decent.
In lowlight, the Nord 4 renders excellent results with beautiful bokeh. And in this case the edge detection is a bit of a hit and miss. But when it hits, the images look good.
Front Camera
With a 16 MP front camera, the images look ok. The output is natural, however the images are slightly hazy sometimes. The images are decently saturated and I would say that in this case the camera is decent.
Front Camera Video
The camera in this case only at 1080p at 30fps. The output is also decent. Although we would’ve liked for the phone to give the option to shoot 4k as well, since the sensor is capable enough.
Video Performance
On the Nord 4, you can shoot up to 4k upto 60fps on the rear camera, where you can choose to shoot at 1x and 2x. But you can also shoot video using the ultrawide camera at 0.6x, but only at 1080p.
The rear camera has OIS, and it works like magic, lending you super stable footage at 1x. At 2x there is a tiny amount of shake and warping is prominent. The output is natural looking with acceptable dynamic range, and no visible signs of over-processing, which is a plus.
In lowlight, the Nord 4 has good detail in the shadow, and because of the image stabilization, it looks better overall at 1x. At 2x there is a shake prominent even with the OIS engaged (you can’t disengage this) and there is a little bit of flaring.
Conclusion
OnePlus Nord 4 is overall a decent camera, but at this price we expected a little bit more than just decent. The 50MP LYT-600 sensor delivers decent performance in daylight and lowlight, although we feel like it could do better if it didn’t overexpose the images most of the time.
In the video department, the 4K60 footage from the main camera had decent dynamic range, but it was still a little bit more overexposed than necessary, leading to visible noise. Overall, the cameras of the Nord 4 can deliver more, especially considering what the Nord 3 has delivered in the past, which the consumers might have come to expect. But this performance isn’t something that can’t be fixed in a software update, at least some of it.
Oppo has just launched the Reno 12 Pro, and because it has “Pro” in its name, its camera features are especially important. The phone is priced at ₹35,990 for the 12GB RAM + 256GB storage model, and ₹39,990 for the 12GB RAM + 512GB storage model. What makes this phone stand out is its focus on photography, using AI to improve camera performance both during shooting and in post-processing. This is the first time Oppo has included such features in any of its phones. In this review, we’ll test the camera and all the features Oppo is highlighting to see if they live up to the hype.
Cameras Specs:
Main Camera: 50MP Sony LYT-600 sensor with OIS, F1.8 lens aperture, FOV 79°
Ultra-Wide: 8MP Sony IMX355 sensor with 112-degree FOV, f/2.2 aperture
Front camera: 50MP Samsung S5KJN5, with autofocus and 90-degree FOV
Powered by the Mediatek Dimensity 7300 processor
Daylight Main Camera
The main camera uses a 50MP Sony LYT-600 sensor, which isn’t the latest and produces images with an actual output of 14MP. The photos are well-saturated and vivid, even with natural settings, making them visually pleasing for most users. However, the zoom performance is slightly weak, with images lacking sharpness in several situations. In some cases, the highlights are blown out, as seen in the samples. The phone’s colour tones and reproduction are accurate, although some photos show high contrast.
Daylight Wide Camera
The wide camera on this phone performs just average. It has an 8-MP Sony IMX355 sensor, but it captures images at 9 MP. The processed images are generally okay. Visually, the pictures look decent, but the contrast levels are off, and zooming in results in poor quality. Although wide lenses on phones often disappoint, this one stands out for not meeting even those lower expectations. However, it does do a good job of recognising and accurately exposing scenes.
Daylight Telephoto Camera
The Oppo phone uses a 50-MP Samsung S5KJN5 sensor, but delivers 14-MP images. It offers 2x optical zoom, with anything beyond that being digital zoom. The camera can zoom up to 20x, and the image quality is acceptable up to a point. At 2x zoom, the images are sharp and have good colour accuracy. At 5x zoom, the images are still usable, but they start losing sharpness and colour accuracy, with increased contrast making them look underexposed. Shadows and highlights also suffer. At 10x and 20x zoom, the quality is mostly for show. The images may have colour fringing, lack sharpness, and sometimes have trouble recognising the subject, creating a hazy effect. These zoom levels are not recommended for serious use.
Lowlight Main Camera
In low light, the main camera produces decent images that look good overall. However, zooming in will reveal some lack of sharpness. For better results in low light, tap on the screen to choose a focus area, as leaving it to the phone’s automatic settings might not give the best outcome. The Oppo camera impresses with its neutral colour reproduction and has decent performance with shadows and highlights.
Lowlight Wide Camera
The lowlight wide camera’s performance is average as seen in daylight. The images tend to be slightly hazy and show noticeable lens flare. As mentioned before, wide-angle lenses aren’t ideal for lowlight conditions.
Lowlight Telephoto Camera
In low light, the telephoto camera performs adequately up to 2x zoom. Beyond that, it struggles, especially in very lowlight conditions where the camera has to boost the aperture and shutter. It’s best to use the telephoto camera only up to 2x zoom, images beyond that may not be usable.
Portraits
The phone allows shooting portraits at 1x and 2x zoom, and the performance is decent. The images are well-saturated with good colour reproduction, though there is some distortion, making subjects appear wider. The lens isn’t the sharpest when zoomed in, and edge detection could be better, with some soft edges around faces in certain conditions. In low light, the portrait performance is better than expected, with good overall output. The phone also features an AI Best Shot mode, which tries to enhance photos by selecting the best shot from a series. This feature can be hit or miss, as it only works with more than three people in the frame, and users typically don’t take multiple shots of the same scene.
Front Camera
The front camera features a 50 MP Samsung sensor and can take pictures at 0.8x, 1x, and 2x zoom levels. The images are quite good, with clear details and accurate colours. The overall performance is solid. In portrait mode, you can only use 0.8x and 1x zoom. Pictures taken at f/1.4 had an unnatural depth of field, and even at f/1.8, the effect was similar. However, edge detection in portrait mode is better than on the rear camera, with smoother and more refined edges, making it look great overall.
Video
The phone records 4K video at up to 30 fps and offers three focal ranges from the back camera. The video output is decent with good stabilization and focussing, and it accurately reproduces colours. For everyday video use, the phone performs well. However, its lowlight video performance isn’t the best. The audio recording quality is also decent. The front camera also shoots up to 4K at 30 fps, delivering decent results. Overall, the camera’s video performance is satisfactory.
AI features
The phone features several AI tools from Oppo, including AI Eraser 2.0, AI Clear Face, AI Best Face, and AI Studio. While many of these tools are available on other phones, the rapid advancement in AI technology is impressive. For example, the AI Eraser tool not only removed an object like a Carrom Board from the background, but also adjusted the background colour to match the sofa and added a switchboard for a more natural look. Though the alignment could be improved, the result is remarkable. Similarly, AI Clear Photo works well, demonstrating that these AI tools can significantly enhance photo quality.
Conclusion
The Oppo Reno 12 Pro cameras deliver a solid performance overall. In daylight, the images are accurate and good, although they tend to lack sharpness in many conditions, which might improve with future updates. The video quality is decent, providing satisfactory results for everyday use. One of the notable strengths of the Oppo Reno 12 Pro is its AI features. The AI tools, such as AI Eraser 2.0, AI Clear Face, AI Best Face, and AI Studio, work well and enhance the overall photography experience. These features are designed to appeal to consumers who appreciate advanced AI capabilities in their smartphones. To give a final word, the Oppo Reno 12 Pro cameras perform well, offering good results in well-lit conditions and decent video quality. The AI features add significant value, making the phone a strong option for users interested in enhanced photography capabilities in this price range.
Sigma recently launched the new 50mm F/1.2 DG DN Art lens for the Sony and the Panasonic mount. Now this is a DG DN lens which means it is for the full frame sensor and these lenses can be used on the Sony’s E-mount and the Panasonics L-mount as well. The MRP for this lens is Rs. 1,33,000, but it can be available for around Rs. 1,17,000 lacs at street price. That is a considerable discount as compared to the other lenses in the same segment. And at this price, the Sigma 50mm becomes a very interesting lens.
Look Body and Feel
In terms of the look, body and feel, at first glance the lens looks sturdy, well-built and also pretty light. Infact it is only weighs 745 gms and being an art lens it comes with weather sealing and a metal mount. The lens is also different as compared to the usual lenses of today and features a host of buttons. I also love the shiny A on the lens denoting that this is the Art lens.
At the front you have a 72mm filter diameter and in terms of the buttons it has the focus ring, the aperture control ring, a lock, autofocus and manual buttons and also a click and de-click button as well. And you can tell that a lot of thought has gone into the details as you turn the aperture dial around to hear its click sound. There’s a different level of satisfaction from that sound, which can only happen if there has been a lot of attention paid to it.. The lens hood also has a familiar design with the unlock button to it, which has been part of the Sigma Art lens design.
Images
Shooting with a 1.2 prime lens is always exciting because it can open really wide and with this lens as well, much like the other Art lenses that Sigma has, the performance is really good. The images are really sharp, very detailed and are able to deliver a pleasing performance that’s impossible to miss. Now as you might know that usually these lenses are always sharp on the centre and slightly soft in the corners. But in this case the lens displayed good sharpness in the corners as well which was good to see.
The focusing is also very fast and you will hardly find it hunting under most conditions. Even in lowlight conditions I found the autofocusing to perform pretty well.
Bokeh Performance
Another advantage that a prime lens gives you is the ability to get some great portraits and bokeh performance. For this lens, Sigma has used a 13-blade rounded diaphragm, which helps with delivering nice rounded bokeh’s. And in terms of performance, we found nice circular bokeh at the centre and cats eye in the corners. The portraits and the depth to the subject also look really good and using this lens really reminds me of why I like prime lenses so much.
Chromatic Aberration
When we checked the lens for chromatic aberration then it gave a CA value of 0.22 pixels through the quick MTF software, which is a pretty good CA value.
Flaring and Ghosting
In terms of flaring and ghosting we shot a number of pics and found the performance pretty decent. Under most conditions the lens was able to cut the flare and ghosting, unless we really pointed it directly into the Sun’s line of sight. So, I’d say that the performance was pretty decent in this case.
Conclusion
Honestly there is hardly anything to dislike about this lens. Its compact, its light, delivers good performance in terms of image quality, both in daylight and lowlight, plus it’s has the ability to deliver good bokeh, which is so important for a prime lens, especially if you are shooting weddings, street photography, etc.
Now what sweetens this deal even more for me is the fact that it is also cheaper than some of the other lenses in the same segment and at a street price of Rs. 1,17,000, which means you can use that extra money to buy more equipment or other lenses that you might desire.
Vivo recently launched their first foldable phone in India, the Vivo X Fold 3 Pro. This is also the third foldable phone to enter the Indian market after Samsung and OnePlus, indicating that these types of phones in the premium segment are becoming popular with consumers. The OnePlus Open was also reviewed, and the appeal of these phones is not only their larger screen but also their impressive camera setups. The Vivo X Fold 3 Pro, co-developed with Zeiss like most of Vivo’s other flagships, will have its cameras tested in this review.
The unit received is in celestial black with specs of 16 GB RAM and 512 GB storage capacity and is priced at ₹1,59,999 in India.
First things first, upon holding the phone, it feels remarkably light, thin, and slim, weighing just 236 g without the cover. Despite its lightness and slim profile, the grip is not very satisfying, though it may improve with continued use.
The camera module at the back lacks the fancy design of the OnePlus Open. It features a black circular module that Vivo calls Big Eye, designed to resemble a luxury watch. However, it mostly appears as a simple circular module, with some interesting details like the outer metal ring, but not much visibility within the module itself.
Specifications:
50 MP Main Camera with an f/1.68 lens and OIS
50 MP Ultra-Wide sensor
64 MP Telephoto Sensor with 3x optical zoom
Both inner and outer screen have 32-MP Selfie Cameras with f/2.4 apertures
Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 Processor
V3 Chip
Daylight Main Camera
The main camera of the Vivo comes with a 50-MP camera featuring an OmniVision OV50H sensor. It shoots at an actual resolution of 12.5 MP.
Images were shot in the Zeiss natural setting, and in most cases, the phone delivers pretty good images. It is able to produce sharp and crisp images. However, upon zooming in, the picture clarity isn’t the best compared to most cameras available today. Generally, it recognizes the scene well, but sometimes it tends to oversaturate or over sharpen the pictures. When the picture is oversaturated, it doesn’t sharpen the image, but when providing the actual scene, it tends to over sharpen, occasionally resulting in slightly underexposed images.
One observation while using the camera is that sometimes the screen display does not match the actual output. The final picture might be much better than what is shown, which can be misleading to the user. This might be considered nit-picking in most cases, and a regular viewer might not even notice such tiny details. However, these discrepancies can create doubt in the consumer’s mind.
Overall, the camera is decent in this case.
Daylight Wide Camera
The phone offers a 50-MP sensor with the wide camera, utilizing the Samsung JN1 sensor. The actual resolution of the wide camera exceeds that of the main camera at 13.8 pixels, and this difference is noticeable when zooming in on performance. There is increased clarity in the images when zoomed in, though, similar to widest lenses, significant zooming introduces a lot of noise.
In terms of overall image quality, the pictures are comparable to those taken with the main camera. They are pleasing to the eye, with the phone accurately recognizing scenes, though it sometimes oversaturates the pictures. Some distortion is also present in the images; for instance, in a picture of a car, the vehicle appears more stretched and wider than usual.
Daylight Telephoto
In the telephoto camera, the phone uses the 64-MP Omni Vision camera which comes with the OV64B sensor. This sensor has become quite popular in the industry, with OnePlus making it their go-to sensor for the telephoto lens. In previous reviews, this sensor was mentioned as one of the best telephoto sensors in the industry currently. The fact that more and more brands are using it indicates its success.
An interesting aspect of the telephoto category is that Vivo provides output at different actual pixels at different focal ranges. At 2x, it gives an output of 14.3 MP, and at 3x optical zoom and above, it provides an output of 18.2 MP. The performance of the camera is impressive. It is sharp, detailed, provides good output, and is definitely worth using.
However, there is a need to discuss this sensor further. Despite its quality, it has a challenge with the output it gives. There is a visible change in the colours of the image as one moves through the focal range, suggesting that this might be more of a hardware issue with the OV64B sensor rather than with the phones themselves. This issue has also been observed in OnePlus devices, initially thought to be fixable through software updates, but this has not happened. At the highest focal ranges, there is also noticeable colour fringing if a picture is taken at 100x.
Lowlight Main Camera
In low light, the camera demonstrates excellent performance. It accurately recognizes scenes and delivers a warm, saturated, and visually pleasing output. Even when zoomed in, its performance remains decent, with commendable handling of shadows and highlights.
Lowlight Wide Camera
In the wide category, the images appear satisfactory at first glance. However, upon closer inspection, it becomes apparent that the performance is below average. The images exhibit noticeable noise and significant distortion. Despite these drawbacks, the camera manages to maintain a commendable tonal range in the pictures, which is a positive aspect worth noting.
Lowlight TelephotoCamera
Much like its daylight performance, the camera excels in low light as well, delivering sharp, well-saturated images. The performance in this category was impressive.
Portraits
In portraits, the phone offers the option to shoot with 5 different focal ranges. This feature is beneficial for consumers, as Vivo now integrates it directly into portrait mode. In some phones, such as those with Leica lenses, Vivo has included similar options, which can be confusing for users. However, Vivo portraits generally exhibit warmth, saturation, sharpness, and overall good quality. Edge detection is reliable, even in backlit environments. The phone performs well in both daylight and lowlight conditions, excelling in bokeh performance, particularly in lowlight situations.
However, a notable drawback is that the camera tends to alter colours from the actual scene, especially evident in images shot at higher focal ranges. Additionally, despite settings indicating otherwise, skin smoothing is noticeable in photos.
Front Camera
Now, users have the option to utilize the back cameras for selfies, although the phone offers dual 32-MP front cameras for capturing pictures.
One notable observation about this phone is the significant disparity between what is displayed on the screen and the actual output, particularly with the front camera. The phone’s screen gives the impression of viewing images in 720p resolution, whereas the actual output is in HD quality. While zooming in reveals sharp details, selfies generally appear decent in most cases.
Video Performance
In terms of video, the phone allows users to shoot in 8k up to 30 fps and 4k up to 60 fps. One notable feature is the ability to shoot using all four focal ranges for video. However, when using the ultra-stabilization mode, the resolution drops to 1080p. Overall, the video output is good, with fast focusing and effective stabilization. The audio quality is also satisfactory, making it suitable for vlogging and similar uses.
Conclusion
So what do we think about the Vivo Fold 3 Pro Cameras, there are several aspects that stand out positively. The camera system delivers sharp, detailed output in both daylight and low-light conditions, which I find quite appealing. While there are areas where the cameras could be improved, this is common across most products. It’s worth noting that the market for foldable phones is growing, although it’s still relatively small. As for the price, at ₹1,59,999, it feels a bit high for a foldable phone in India. However, for anyone interested in a foldable phone with a strong camera, this could be a compelling choice.
Nikon recently launched the new 28-400 mm lens for its full frame Mirrorless Z range of cameras. The lens is priced at Rs. 1,28,995 and it comes in the all-round superzoom category. Now the reason why I call this lens an all-round lens, because it can go as wide as 28mm all the way upto 400, making it a very versatile lens to use.
But the important questions here is – who is this targeted to? It’s targeted to someone who is an amateur wildlife enthusiast, street photographers, may be sports, although it isn’t fast enough for that.
Look, Body and Feel
The first thing I notice about the lens is that it is pretty light. This weighs only 725 gms and for a superzoom lens that it pretty light. For this review I am using this with the Nikon Z7 ii and overall it feels like a sturdy package to lug around. At the front you have the 77mm diameter for the lens along with the focus and zoom ring on the lens.
NIKKOR Z 28-400mm f/4-8 VR Lens
The lens is slightly hard to extend, but over time I feel it will loosen up a little. But there is a lens lock button that is provided to avoid accidental lens creep. I like the build quality of the lens as well, it feels well-built and sturdy. What I am surprised with is the weather sealing, although the specs say that it does feature weather sealing, visibly it is lesser that other lenses that i’ve seen. So this means that the production standard might’ve improved for that to not be visible anymore.
Image Performance
Now with a lens like this where you have the F-stop at F/4-8, it will always be difficult to get the best performance in lowlight, because it won’t allow much light to get in, especially in lowlight scenarios. Another thing to note is that after 200mm, the lens also shifts to an F/8 for shooting.
Now in terms of images in daylight, the performance of the lens is pretty good. At 28mm the pics are sharp, detailed and also are pleasing to the eye. But as you start moving higher in the focal range you can see that the images do have certain softness on the edges and also on zooming in, it will lose some clarity. Now this isn’t something to be surprised about, most lenses in the superzoom category are like that, so this isn’t unusual.
In daylight the focusing is also fast. This lens uses the STM motor, which is the stepping motor to autofocus. It is pretty smooth and quiet, which can be useful when shooting videos. And since it has a longer focal ranges it can be very useful for shooting documentaries. The videos we shot with this were very good (watch video review here), stable and there was quality output. Another good thing that I liked is that the lens features in-built vibration reduction, which works upto 5 stops and the performance of that was also very good.
But as good as the lens is in terms of autofocus in daylight, it does hunt slightly in the lowlight conditions. But truth be told I wasn’t expecting the lens to perform very well in lowlight, but I was surprised with the performance. The overall images are good, yes there is a focusing challenge, but when it focuses it delivers good pics. What I like is that with a focal range like this you can use this for street photography also, especially the pics showed good contrast and surprisingly were well lit.
The depth and bokeh as well on the lens were pretty good in both daylight and lowlight.
Minimum focusing distance
For a versatile lens with a superzoom, this lens also gives you the option for getting in closer. The minimum focusing distance of the lens at 28mm is 0.66 ft and at 400mm is 3.69 ft, which is pretty good. The images at both 28mm and 400 mm are pretty decent and I really like the performance in this case. Yes, at the closer range there is surely sharpness at the centre and more softness on the sides. But if used wisely then it can surely be an asset.
Lens flare and ghosting
In terms of the lens flare and ghosting, this is probably one of the best lenses that I have seen in recent times. There is hardly any lens flare of ghosting even when we shot intentionally to test it. The images from the lens under varied scenes don’t show any visible glaring and ghosting and that was something that I was really impressed with.
In terms of CA value, the lens does display a value of 0.84 pixels, which is on the higher side.
CA Value: 0.84 pixels
Conclusion
So how do I find the new Nikon 28-400 mm lens for the Z mount? Honestly my feelings are mixed. Yes it isn’t a lens that will completely blow your mind from the onset. Because it really isn’t a fast lens, which means that you start thinking about its performance, atleast in lowlight. But I was pleasantly surprised with it. The daylight performance is very good, it’s well built and overall gives a good performance. The performance in lowlight could be better though.
But more importantly it gives the user the opportunity to do away multiple lenses at a price of Rs. 1.3 lacs. Which means you don’t have to carry that additional gear. And that to me sounds like a good scenario to be in.
In this review we are comparing the cameras of the OnePlus Nord CE 4 vs Vivo V30e cameras. Both of these phones come in very interesting price category, between ₹25,000 – 28,000. Now this is a very competitive market and also something that users tend to use a lot. Both these phones are the best variants that the manufacturers offer, 8GB RAM and a 256GB capacity which is expandable to 1TB using an external card. The OnePlus is more affordable of the two coming in with a price of ₹27,000, while the Vivo is for ₹30,000.
Camera Set up
At the back both these come with a dual camera set up which are identical, they both feature a 50-MP main camera and an 8-MP ultrawide camera set up. But there are two major differences between them, one the front camera of the Vivo is also a 50 MP camera while the OnePlus is at 16 MP and the other is that the Nord 4 CE is powered by the Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 while the Vivo is powered by the 6 Gen 1 processor. Now to the naked eye this might not seem much, but the processor can make a big difference to the performance of the phones, both in the cameras as well as the overall performance.
Both these are powered by the Android 14 with the layer of Oxygen and Funtouch OS.
Daylight Main Camera
A quick look at the sensors of the camera tells us that both manufactures have used different sensors, the OnePlus uses the Sony Lytia 600 sensor which we have now seen on the Open as well as the 12. While the Vivo uses the Sony IMX 882.
In terms of pics, for a camera which offers 50 MP the performance from both of them is ok. The Vivo in some cases boosts the saturation than the actual scene and giving out more reddish tinge to it. On the other hand, the OP was able to give the output as per the original scene. And because of this compensation, the vivo also boosts the contrast of the image leading to the shadow and highlights being blown out. On zooming in as well the images from the OP are sharper than the Vivo.
We put the phones in a challenging shooting scene with harsh light to see multiple things and in this case as well the Vivo was over saturating the pics and also blowing out some details. If you see the wire in this pic then it has blown out coz of the over compensation. I liked the performance of the OP in this case since it didn’t blow out the sky and made it appear bluish which was slightly dull in the Vivo.
But in cases where you are looking for a better saturation and poppy colours then the Vivo would come out on top with the images looking more pleasing to the eye. Although the flare performance could be better.
Daylight Wide
The wide camera of both the phones comes in at 8 MP and its isn’t the best resolution that you get today. But in this price bracket I don’t think the manufacturers can give you much more either.
The images from both of them are ok. The Vivo again displays signs of over saturation but the performance of the flaring is pretty good in this case, much better than OP. But closer to the actual scene, the OP is able to deliver it much better, the Vivo in this case consistently displayed a yellowish or reddish tinge in most cases. I also found the distortion performance of the OP much better.
Daylight Telephoto
In the telephoto category both the phones allow the user to click upto 2x and then shift to digital zoom of 10x for the Vivo and 20x for the OP.
2X5X10X
In this case the performance of both the phones up to 2 to 3x is decent. Anything beyond that I wouldn’t expect a lot. To the naked eye, the OP appears to be sharper on zooming in, but there is hardly any difference between the two honestly. What works for the Vivo in this case is the saturation compensation for vivo which makes some images appear more sharper and pleasing to the eye.
But overall, for zoom purposes and also at high focal ranges the OP is much sharper than the Vivo.
Lowlight Main
In lowlight, the main camera of the OP is again much better giving better sharpness and more saturation as well. The overall image from the Vivo appears to have some sort of a haze due to which the images aren’t looking sharp or saturated. Even on zooming in you can find more details in the pics from the OP. Overall the OP does seem to show a lot more clarity, saturation and also true to scene pics in this case.
Lowlight Wide
And this performance continues in the wide category as well. The Vivo gives a slight reddish tinge to the images while the OP gives a slight yellowing tinge in some cases under ambient light. But under more natural conditions the images from the Vivo seem better than the OP. The images do come slightly underexposed in the OP while they seem well lit and saturated in Vivo.
Lowlight Telephoto
Under this category neither of these phones are that great. At best they are passable.
2X5X10X
At 2x the OP displays much better shapes and quality but anything beyond that, both the phones start losing sharpness and in my mind images under such conditions can be used much. As you go higher into the focal range the difference seems more apparent. And in this case as well the OP has a much better quality than the Vivo.
Portraits
In terms of portraits the Vivo gives you the option to use the aura light to shoot more warmer portraits if you want. But the images from that are warmer and the fill of the light can be much better. Also, by default the setting for skin smoothening is on for the Vivo so if you are someone who doesn’t like that then you should put it off in settings.
In general, the images from either of the phones are decent. The output is sharp in most cases, but the edge detection could be better. Now with these types of phones I don’t expect them to have excellent output in terms of bokeh and depth, but in this case as well the OP is visibly much better. The depth is more real and better than the Vivo.
Front Camera
The front camera has quite a bit of difference between both of the phones. The vivo has a 50-megapixel camera, whereas the OnePlus has a 16-megapixel camera in terms of resolution, and the Vivo definitely has an advantage in this case on paper.
But despite the resolution advantage, the images from the OP are well saturated and good. In terms of portraits as well the pictures from both the phones are decent. The have a decent edge detection, especially in backlight scenarios and can be passed at decent images.
Video
When it comes to Videos, both the phones can shoot 4k upto 60 fps and the output from both of them is good. In daylight there is very little to choose between either of them, but in lowlight the OP seems much better than the Vivo. The stabilisation also works better in the OP as you can see from the samples.
Conclusion
So which phone has the better camera? The OnePlus or the Vivo? They both have something that works well for them, but in this case for me the OnePlus Nord CE 4 is the winner, not only because the camera is better under most conditions, but also since it features a much faster processer, specs and also is more economically priced than the Vivo.
