Tag Archives: Camera Review

Nikon Z6III Review: Does It Actually Outperform?

The Nikon Z6III was launched in June 2024 with the tagline ‘Outperform’. Nikon has positioned it as a camera that excels in both photography and videography. Its predecessor, the Z6II, was released in 2020, making this upgrade a long-awaited one. We had the opportunity to test the Z6III extensively for over a month before featuring it in our magazine.

Who Is It For?

This camera is designed for users seeking a versatile tool capable of handling various photography styles, including street, sports, landscapes, and weddings. Nikon has emphasized this versatility in its marketing and communications as well.

Look, Body and Feel

If you’re a Nikon user, the Z6III will feel instantly familiar. The build quality is excellent and at 760 grams, the camera strikes a balance between sturdiness and portability. The deep, comfortable grip enhances handling, while the two programmable function buttons on the back offer quick access to settings.

Most of the button placements remain consistent with the Z6II, ensuring a seamless transition for existing users. A slight redesign on the top right accommodates the video, ISO and exposure compensation buttons for easier access. This ergonomic refinement enhances usability and these buttons can be customized as well.


The rear buttons are well-positioned, and while a joystick is present, the OK button often feels
more intuitive. A significant upgrade from the Z6II is the fully articulated rear screen, maintaining the same size and resolution but now offering greater flexibility for shooting at different angles – a welcome improvement.

Still from our review video


Nikon has not explicitly claimed weather sealing for this body, but given the outperform branding, it’s reasonable to expect a degree of durability against the elements.

What Makes It Special?

The Nikon Z6III introduces several standout features, including the world’s first 24.5 MP partially stacked full-frame sensor. This innovation provides key advantages, as claimed by Nikon, such as:

  • Unlimited photo buffer
  • Internal RAW at up to 6K60p and ProRes RAW recording up to 5.4K up to 60p
  • 4K120 video recording (Dx crop)
  • 60 & 120fps burst rate in JPEG mode (120fps in Dx crop)
  • 20fps burst rate with an electronic shutter

Image Quality


The overall image quality is impressive, delivering sharp and detailed photos with excellent dynamic range. Colour saturation and reproduction are accurate, while shadow and highlight retention are commendable. In high-contrast scenarios, some adjustments may be necessary, but the performance remains strong.

Shutter Performance (Electronic & Mechanical)

Thanks to its partially stacked sensor, the Z6III supports an electronic shutter. However, some flickering
was noticeable in certain lighting conditions, a common issue with electronic shutters. Rolling shutter effects were present but less pronounced compared to older models like the Sony A7 IV, benefiting from the newer sensor technology.

Electronic shutter banding


The mechanical shutter offers 14fps burst shooting, while the electronic shutter reaches 20fps. The ability to shoot continuously is excellent, though the camera does heat up slightly in burst mode, however it isn’t anything that can’t be managed.

Autofocus & Tracking


The upgraded AF system introduces subject detection and 3D tracking, marking a significant improvement over its predecessor. In both daylight and low light, the autofocus performs exceptionally well, locking onto subjects with impressive accuracy.


However, in crowded scenes, the focus can momentarily shift between eyes before recognizing a new subject. This minor issue could potentially be resolved through a firmware update. Tested with 35mm and 50mm f/1.4 lenses, the autofocus speed was as fast as Nikon advertises.

tracking performance


ISO Performance


The Z6III handles ISO well. Even at high ISOs like 6400 to 12,800, images remain usable, though
sharpness and clarity take a slight hit. In challenging conditions, capturing the shot often takes
precedence over achieving perfection.


For video, high ISOs paired with fast f/1.4 lenses result in clean, noise-free footage, expanding creative possibilities for filmmakers.


Video Capabilities

In terms of video the camera offers 6K recording up to 60fps and 4K up to 120fps (with crop). Also much like the other cameras, it also has a 125-minute recording limit, making it highly practical.

Even in extreme low light, the camera delivers high-quality video with minimal noise. Paired with 35mm and 50mm f/1.4 lenses, the results are quite cinematic.


The RED Acquisition

With Nikon acquiring RED, we anticipate deeper integration of RED’s technology into Nikon cameras. And you can see a hint of that in this camera. Z6 III can shoot compressed RAW video recording, previously exclusive to high-end models like the Z8 and Z9. It also has LUT support for N-RAW and N-Log footage, allowing users to match RED’s signature colour science. Nikon has made these LUTs freely available on their website.


Electronic Viewfinder (EVF)


The Z6III features a 5.76 million-dot EVF, delivering sharp visuals. It has a refresh rate of 60Hz with 120Hz unclaimed, as there is an option to turn on “high framerate” in the menu. However, the EVF sensor is extremely sensitive, causing the screen to turn off with even slight movements – something to be mindful of.


Conclusion

At a price of ₹2.23 lakh, does the Nikon Z6III truly ‘Outperform’?
Compared to other cameras in its category, it offers a good balance of features, performance, and value. Nikon has strategically positioned it between entry-level models like the Z5 and professional bodies like the Z8/Z9.
Now there are always a few things that can be improved in every product and this isn’t any different. But overall, for someone who is looking to shoot images and video both, I can see this being a compelling buy, and one that we surely give our thumbs up!

Watch our video review:

Nikon NIKKOR Z 35mm F/1.4 Lens Review

Nikon’s latest prime lens, the NIKKOR Z 35mm F/1.4 is the first F/1.4 prime lens for the Z mount lineup. The second is the 50mm F/1.4, which we have also reviewed in the issue, so be sure to check that out as well.

Design, Build & Handling

At first glance, the Z 35mm F/1.4 looks strikingly similar to its sibling, the 50mm F/1.4. Nikon deserves credit for maintaining design consistency across these lenses. Weighing just 415 grams, it is compact and lightweight, making it a highly portable choice.

The lens sports a 62mm filter diameter and boasts a premium, robust build. When paired with the Nikon Z6III, it achieves excellent balance – a setup ideal for both photography and videography.

The design is minimalistic, featuring only two rings: the focus ring and the customizable control ring. Unlike some other lenses, it lacks additional buttons. Nikon’s reasoning here seems clear – photographers and videographers often use focal lengths like 35mm and 50mm for video work, especially on gimbals. The simpler design ensures quick lens swaps without the hassle of recalibration.

Autofocus Performance

Lowlight image

The Z 35mm F/1.4 is equipped with a stepping motor, offering fast, silent autofocus performance. While there’s no built-in image stabilization, the lens delivers smooth, quick focussing both during the day and in low light conditions.

For video shooters, the autofocus transition between points is remarkably smooth. Nikon has also done an excellent job correcting focus breathing, resulting in cinematic-quality footage that filmmakers will appreciate.

Image Quality

Daylight image

When it comes to performance, the image quality from this lens is impressive. Photos are sharp and well-detailed in daylight, while low light conditions allow for atmospheric shots with excellent depth and mood.

While there are minor focus-hunting issues in specific scenarios, you can work around them to achieve results. Edge sharpness exhibits slight softness, but overall, the lens delivers good performance.

Flaring & Ghosting

Very minimal flaring against a light source

Despite lacking the fluorine coating found in Nikon’s S-series lenses, the Z 35mm F/1.4 handles flaring surprisingly well. Even though Nikon includes a lens hood in the box, you can often leave it behind to maintain a minimal and stealthy setup.

That said, because of the absence of fluorine coating, the front element tends to attract dirt and oil more quickly. A microfiber cloth will be essential to keep the lens clean.

Bokeh Performance

If you’re a fan of creamy bokeh, the Z 35mm F/1.4 won’t disappoint. The lens produces smooth, round bokeh across most of the frame. However, in certain areas, the bokeh can appear slightly squished, resembling an egg shape.

Chromatic Aberration (CA)

Running the lens through the Quick MTF app gave an output of 0.42 pixels for chromatic aberration. For a prime lens in this category, that’s a solid result and within acceptable limits.

Verdict

So, what’s our take on the NIKKOR Z 35mm F/1.4? At a price point of ₹89,999, it’s ₹10,000 more than Nikon’s 50mm F/1.4. However, when you compare it to competitors like Sony and Canon, whose 35mm F/1.4 lenses start at around ₹1.4 lakh, Nikon’s offering stands out as a fantastic value-for-money option.

For many photographers, a 50mm can feel too tight, and a wider 35mm is the perfect solution – offering a broader field of view without noticeable distortion. Whether you’re a street photographer looking for versatility or someone who needs a lightweight, travel-friendly lens that performs in both daylight and low light, the Z 35mm F/1.4 is an excellent choice.

Product Photo of Fujifilm X-T50

FUJIFILM India launches the FUJIFILM X-T50 at ₹1,49,999

FUJIFILM India has unveiled the X-T50, the latest addition to its X series of mirrorless digital cameras. Priced at ₹1,49,999 for the body, the X-T50 combines exceptional image quality with a compact, lightweight design, targeting both photography enthusiasts and professionals.

The X-T50 is equipped with a new 40.2-megapixel X-Trans CMOS 5 HR sensor and the X-Processor 5, ensuring high-resolution images and advanced performance. Despite its powerful capabilities, the camera is lightweight, weighing only 438 grams, making it a convenient option for photographers on the go.

A major highlight of the X-T50 is its 5-axis in-body image stabilization, offering up to 7 stops of stabilization. This feature enables steady handheld shooting even in low-light conditions. The camera also supports 6.2K/30P video recording with tracking autofocus, catering to both still photography and video recording needs.

The X-T50 also introduces a Film Simulation dial on the top plate, a new feature that allows users to switch between 20 different Film Simulation modes, including the newly added “REALA ACE.” This mode offers faithful colour reproduction and smooth tonal gradations, enhancing the creative potential for both stills and videos.

The X-T50’s AI-based autofocus system can detect a wide range of subjects, including animals, birds, vehicles, and drones. An advanced AF prediction algorithm further improves the camera’s ability to track fast-moving subjects, ensuring precise focus in dynamic shooting scenarios.

The FUJIFILM X-T50 is now available for purchase from all online and retail outlets.

OnePlus Nord CE 4 vs Vivo V30e Camera Test

In this review we are comparing the cameras of the OnePlus Nord CE 4 vs Vivo V30e cameras. Both of these phones come in very interesting price category, between ₹25,000 – 28,000. Now this is a very competitive market and also something that users tend to use a lot. Both these phones are the best variants that the manufacturers offer, 8GB RAM and a 256GB capacity which is expandable to 1TB using an external card. The OnePlus is more affordable of the two coming in with a price of ₹27,000, while the Vivo is for ₹30,000.

Camera Set up

At the back both these come with a dual camera set up which are identical, they both feature a 50-MP main camera and an 8-MP ultrawide camera set up. But there are two major differences between them, one the front camera of the Vivo is also a 50 MP camera while the OnePlus is at 16 MP and the other is that the Nord 4 CE is powered by the Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 while the Vivo is powered by the 6 Gen 1 processor. Now to the naked eye this might not seem much, but the processor can make a big difference to the performance of the phones, both in the cameras as well as the overall performance.

Both these are powered by the Android 14 with the layer of Oxygen and Funtouch OS.

Daylight Main Camera

A quick look at the sensors of the camera tells us that both manufactures have used different sensors, the OnePlus uses the Sony Lytia 600 sensor which we have now seen on the Open as well as the 12. While the Vivo uses the Sony IMX 882.

In terms of pics, for a camera which offers 50 MP the performance from both of them is ok. The Vivo in some cases boosts the saturation than the actual scene and giving out more reddish tinge to it. On the other hand, the OP was able to give the output as per the original scene. And because of this compensation, the vivo also boosts the contrast of the image leading to the shadow and highlights being blown out. On zooming in as well the images from the OP are sharper than the Vivo.

We put the phones in a challenging shooting scene with harsh light to see multiple things and in this case as well the Vivo was over saturating the pics and also blowing out some details. If you see the wire in this pic then it has blown out coz of the over compensation. I liked the performance of the OP in this case since it didn’t blow out the sky and made it appear bluish which was slightly dull in the Vivo.

But in cases where you are looking for a better saturation and poppy colours then the Vivo would come out on top with the images looking more pleasing to the eye. Although the flare performance could be better.

Daylight Wide

The wide camera of both the phones comes in at 8 MP and its isn’t the best resolution that you get today. But in this price bracket I don’t think the manufacturers can give you much more either.

The images from both of them are ok. The Vivo again displays signs of over saturation but the performance of the flaring is pretty good in this case, much better than OP. But closer to the actual scene, the OP is able to deliver it much better, the Vivo in this case consistently displayed a yellowish or reddish tinge in most cases. I also found the distortion performance of the OP much better.

Daylight Telephoto

In the telephoto category both the phones allow the user to click upto 2x and then shift to digital zoom of 10x for the Vivo and 20x for the OP.

2X
5X
10X

In this case the performance of both the phones up to 2 to 3x is decent. Anything beyond that I wouldn’t expect a lot. To the naked eye, the OP appears to be sharper on zooming in, but there is hardly any difference between the two honestly. What works for the Vivo in this case is the saturation compensation for vivo which makes some images appear more sharper and pleasing to the eye.

But overall, for zoom purposes and also at high focal ranges the OP is much sharper than the Vivo.

Lowlight Main

In lowlight, the main camera of the OP is again much better giving better sharpness and more saturation as well. The overall image from the Vivo appears to have some sort of a haze due to which the images aren’t looking sharp or saturated. Even on zooming in you can find more details in the pics from the OP. Overall the OP does seem to show a lot more clarity, saturation and also true to scene pics in this case.

Lowlight Wide

And this performance continues in the wide category as well. The Vivo gives a slight reddish tinge to the images while the OP gives a slight yellowing tinge in some cases under ambient light. But under more natural conditions the images from the Vivo seem better than the OP. The images do come slightly underexposed in the OP while they seem well lit and saturated in Vivo.

Lowlight Telephoto

Under this category neither of these phones are that great. At best they are passable.

2X
5X
10X

At 2x the OP displays much better shapes and quality but anything beyond that, both the phones start losing sharpness and in my mind images under such conditions can be used much. As you go higher into the focal range the difference seems more apparent. And in this case as well the OP has a much better quality than the Vivo.

Portraits

In terms of portraits the Vivo gives you the option to use the aura light to shoot more warmer portraits if you want. But the images from that are warmer and the fill of the light can be much better. Also, by default the setting for skin smoothening is on for the Vivo so if you are someone who doesn’t like that then you should put it off in settings.

In general, the images from either of the phones are decent. The output is sharp in most cases, but the edge detection could be better. Now with these types of phones I don’t expect them to have excellent output in terms of bokeh and depth, but in this case as well the OP is visibly much better. The depth is more real and better than the Vivo.

Front Camera

The front camera has quite a bit of difference between both of the phones. The vivo has a 50-megapixel camera, whereas the OnePlus has a 16-megapixel camera in terms of resolution, and the Vivo definitely has an advantage in this case on paper.

But despite the resolution advantage, the images from the OP are well saturated and good. In terms of portraits as well the pictures from both the phones are decent. The have a decent edge detection, especially in backlight scenarios and can be passed at decent images.

Video

When it comes to Videos, both the phones can shoot 4k upto 60 fps and the output from both of them is good. In daylight there is very little to choose between either of them, but in lowlight the OP seems much better than the Vivo. The stabilisation also works better in the OP as you can see from the samples.

Conclusion

So which phone has the better camera? The OnePlus or the Vivo? They both have something that works well for them, but in this case for me the OnePlus Nord CE 4 is the winner, not only because the camera is better under most conditions, but also since it features a much faster processer, specs and also is more economically priced than the Vivo.

Bhavya Desai

April 2024


Cover by Sean Dalton 📷

In this issue read:

~ Voyage From Vision to Discovery – Sean Dalton

~ From Local Trails to Golabl Tales – Ganesh Bagal

~ From Drawing Boards to Composing Frames – Hegde Arun

~ A Comprehensive Guide for Indian Photographers Embarking on International Sojourns

~ A Photographer’s Guide to Cost-Effective Travel in India

~ How to be a Travel Photographer in Your Own City

~ Fujifilm Instax PAL Review